User talk:Belladonna

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. Here are some useful links in case you haven't already found them;

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

Tip: you can sign your name with ~~~~

snoyes 22:55, 29 Nov 2003 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Belladonna! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 14 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Yolanda Celbridge - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Wendy Swanscombe - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:43, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wendy Swanscombe

The article Wendy Swanscombe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable person, unreferenced, not even clear that this is a real person

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 16:54, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yolanda Celbridge

The article Yolanda Celbridge has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable person, unreferenced, not even clear that this is a real person

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 17:04, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Wendy Swanscombe

I have nominated Wendy Swanscombe, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wendy Swanscombe. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Deor (talk) 14:44, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Yolanda Celbridge

I have nominated Yolanda Celbridge, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yolanda Celbridge. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Deor (talk) 15:00, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Arabella Knight listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Arabella Knight. Since you had some involvement with the Arabella Knight redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Gorthian (talk) 06:08, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Penny Birch for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Penny Birch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Penny Birch until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 10:18, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]