User talk:Blainster

Archives

2005 talk.2006 talk.

Re: Talk:Fossil fuel power plant

I have added comments to the Talk Page about fossil fuel power plants. I was wondering why trouble is taken in converting steam into water after the steam turbine, only to be turned right back into steam again later in the furnace. You could just send the steam from the steam turbine straight back into the furnace. I thought you may be able to educate me as to why this is not done. *Just thought* Is it because the vacuum created by the condensing water helps drive the turbines faster?--JB001 14:13, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do we really need 4 articles on the same subject?

Wikipedia now has these 4 articles, all on the same subject:

Do we really need all of these? In my opinion, this sort of thing reflects badly on Wikipedia. What can we do to get these four articles merged?? - mbeychok 18:04, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit at Mole

		The Minor Barnstar
		For finally correcting the value of Mole and saving me and many others from widespread misconception :) æn↓þæµß¶-ŧ-¢ 22:55, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have no idea. From where I come, I was taught the incorrect value(6.023) for 3 years. At such minor doubt, I turned to Wikipedia, nd it was wrong :) That is why the Barnstar! --æn↓þæµß¶-ŧ-¢(I prefer replying to each other's talk pages.) 11:43, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Artificial Limb Edit

Hi, I saw you changed the history section back to what it had been a couple days ago by taking out a new paragrpah. I'm new to wikipedia and didn't really understand why you made this change. Could you give me a little more detail on my talk page? Thanks Nfk17 03:14, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comprehensive NT

Thanks for your note. The book is being published by Cornerstone. I have a prepublication copy and got permission to use material from it, but it shouldn't be available on Amazon until the summer. Tim 13:33, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for advice on categorisation

Thank you for your advice on how to categorise correcly in Wikipedia. I am not very computer-savvy, so tips like this are always welcome. ACEOREVIVED 19:59, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your WP:AIV post

Hi Blainster! I noticed you placed a request for protection for Isaac Newton at AIV. In future, it's best to place requests for protection at WP:RFPP, where they will get attended to. Thanks :) – riana_dzasta 06:28, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Subpage mistake

Thank you so much for checking for my own accuracy! Unfortunately, I don't understand the mistake I made. what's wrong with [[User:Ephileli/POV|My POV]]?

I'm about to start reading Siddhartha (novel). Have you read it? --Ephilei 03:42, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pierce

Thanks for letting me know about Slim Margin and the others. :-) I've reverted to a December version, protected the page, and left a note for you on talk. Cheers, SlimVirgin ^(talk) 09:57, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppets

Hmm, the semi-protection didn't appear to be working that time. I'll try re-applying it. Jayjg ^(talk) 20:29, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rock Springs Massacreeee

Hello. About six months ago I penned this article, Rock Springs Massacre, which I have been working hard to cleanup and reference and de-POVify, now being, of course, a much more experienced Wikipedian (I think I wrote that about two weeks after registering). I remembered you giving some helpful tips and edits in the past so I thought I would contact you. Anyway, its up for peer review, and as I said I have been working to improve it, any input or edits you could provide would be greatly appreciated. I am hoping to one day make this a Featured Article Candidate, it may be up to GA as is, would be my fourth now if I nominate it, what do you think? Is it ready? Thanks in advance. IvoShandor 15:18, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re: Banned user Jon Awbrey

This banned user continually makes new sockpuppets (the latest is User:Samboner) and continues to edit Charles Peirce. Please see Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Jon Awbrey. It seems our defense is to keep the article semi-protected and keep blocking the new usernames as he creates them. I also notified Jayjg who has been dealing with Awbrey for a long time. --Blainster 16:14, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I feel more comfortable letting Jayig handle this, if he has experience with this situation. But let me know if there's anything you'd like me to do. --Fang Aili ^talk 16:30, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know; I've blocked the latest 5 socks. Jayjg ^(talk) 22:05, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Paul Tillich and Calvinism

Was Tillich so much a 'Lutheran', or in actuallity from the German Evangelical tradition (the union of German Lutheran and German Reformed churches in Germany)? My understanding was that he was brought to America connected with the Evangelical Synod of North America (the same denomination of the Niebuhr brothers), which subsequently became part of the Evangelical and Reformed Church, and then finally part of the United Church of Christ. Also, I suspect one could probably make the case that Tillich's influence was probably greater on moderate-to-liberal Reformed type folks (the United Church of Christ, moderate-to-liberal Presbyterians, etc.) than it has been on Lutherans. I will confess that I don't have much at hand in the way of sources/citations for any of this at the moment. Emerymat 15:45, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re: Harvey Cox

Regarding your concerns about the Category:American sailors and inclusion in Wikipedia:WikiProject Maritime Trades, the second paragraph begins "After a stint in the U.S. Merchant Marine..." which seems to cover both items. I've copied this on your talk page for your convenience, and will happily continue the conversation, if you desire, on my talk page. Cheers. Haus^Talk 16:54, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ACM founder

Hey Blainster, do you happen to know of any way to source the founder(s) of the ACM? I saw that you added Berkeley as the founder, but it was my impression that the ACM was not founded by any one person, but actually a group. I also have it in my mind that the group consisted of seven individuals, each of whose signatures appear on the founding document of the organization. I don't know what this document was, or where it is, or who signed it, or how any of this might be sourced, which is why I'm hoping you can help fill in the gaps. Cheers, Robert K S 20:49, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Integral talk

I originally moved integral theory to integral thought (renamed it, essentially) to include writers who are not technically theorists, like William Irwin Thompson, who is a poet/literary figure/cultural critic. Later, M. Alan Kazlev split the article intto Integral Thought, a broader broup, and Integral theory, about Ken Wilber and the group of authors and artists around his theory. — goethean ॐ 19:21, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just removed the redirect code from Talk:Integral theory. — goethean ॐ 19:22, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rock Springs Massacre

Hello there. Since you have commented on or assisted with editing Rock Springs Massacre in the past, I thought I would notify you that the article reached Good article status recently, (if you didn't already know that). Since then I have undertaken a significant expansion/overhaul/source verification mission which has resulted in a new version of the article. Soon, I hope to take it to Featured Article candidates. What it needs now is some outside input and copy editing. Anything you can offer in the area would be helpful. You may want to start by taking a look at the talk page first, I have been updating my progress on the article there regularly. Thanks ahead of time for your help. IvoShandor 09:31, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Glider

Yes, admins serve as bookkeepers in this matter. However, CFDs are not decided by headcount. What is relevant is that there's already a list article that covers the subject better (so no information is lost here), that we in general don't categorize people by hobby, and that the debate centered around whether piloting a glider was or was not a defining characteristic. It has been shown that the cat contained mostly people who are famous in other fields, and also happen to like gliding; as such, it is not defining (unlike, say, Category:Aviators, which in general contains people famous for being an aviator). HTH! >Radiant< 08:16, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article on Matrixism: a Religion Based on the Writings of Aldous Huxley

There is an article on a entheogenic new religious movement called Matrixism being created at User:Xoloz/Matrixism. There are numerous sources for this article yet it has because contentious because it deals with the subject of entheogens. Thought you might like to look at it and perhaps contribute. 206.124.144.3 05:25, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mainline

You wrote: Please don't change an article title (Mainline) by using redirect. That is what the move tab is for. Read Help:Merging and moving pages for the correct procedure. What you did hides access to the article's history. --Blainster 07:57, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Sorry about that. I got into a tangle trying to sort out a chain of items and ran out of time to check it thoroughly, didn't realise all the ramifications. Regards, Rexparry sydney 06:28, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of Swamini Dayananda Saraswati

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Swamini Dayananda Saraswati, by Closedmouth (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Swamini Dayananda Saraswati is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Swamini Dayananda Saraswati, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 07:40, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bot in categories

I am not clear why the bot (or you) is placing itself into categories which are meant for articles, not users or Wikiprojects. What is the reason for it? --Blainster 10:23, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Blainster! The bot is using the page User:SatyrBot/Current project to work from - that's where it finds the current WikiProject banner it's working with, as well as the categories it needs to traverse. In general, the categories only stay on that page for a day or so until the bot has run through them, then I replace them with the next batch of categories. Sorry if that's annoying, but it's the best way I've found to work. It lets the project review the categories before the bot runs them to make sure they're correct - and remove any that aren't right. Thanks for the note! -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 13:37, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Would appreciate your comments on Afd

Blainster, I would appreciate it if you took the time to comment on the proposed deletion of the Air pollution dispersion modeling books article. The discussion on the proposed deletion is located at: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air pollution dispersion modeling books. I oppose the deletion. Regards, - mbeychok (talk) 19:16, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vietnam Vets

please take a look at above page and see if you think reference to k. adams 1950 is probable vandalism. thanks. Toyokuni3 (talk) 16:12, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

very good catch

on the spam at Bruce Chilton - I missed the way those ISBNs had been linked. I've cleanup tup the content there also. The ip doing it has been warned many times previously, so I have blocked it and will be alert to further abuse of the sort. It is extensive enough that I will probably also contact the employer's head of PR from my university address. DGG (talk) 04:16, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ken Wilber

Hi there. Would you like to step over the Ken Wilber and give your opinion on an issue? — goethean ॐ 14:49, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Recent cat deletion: electronic music pioneers

I did not see this discussion until it was closed. The cat was removed on what looks to be a 2/3 vote. I agree with your assessment, this is no different from the cats of other pioneers in technology progress. The cat should have been kept and narrowed to the inventors and developers of the technology. With my vote it would have been 2/4 and would not have had "consensus". Would you support me if I restored the category? Also, I only know of perhaps 4 or 5 who qualify for the category (Moog, Carlos, Mauzey, Theremin). Can you help with any others? --Blainster (talk) 22:05, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Restoring a deleted category is not a good idea, as it mostly perpetuates the conflict. The next place to take this would be Wikipedia:Deletion review, where it can be considered by more seasoned Admins. If you need help with this, I will be back online tomorrow, but all you need for now is to request that the deletion be overturned.

Off the top of my head, I would add Raymond Scott, Louis and Bebe Barron and Pierre Schaeffer to that list, but I am no expert. Many notables are listed linked from Electronic art music and other Main article articles linked from Electronic music. / edg ☺ ☭ 03:17, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll be tied up for the next day or two, but appreciate your suggestions. --Blainster (talk) 07:38, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since there was nothing wrong process-wise with this deletion, I don't wish to appeal to WP:DRV on my own. Let me know when you're available. / edg ☺ ☭ 13:26, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits

Hi, I apologize that my edits were not very clear. I had provided justification on Rbreen's talk page. Thanks, Mineminemine (talk) 21:10, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quantum Metaphysics

Thank you for your post re QM & Mysticism. You put the problem very brilliantly.

As I think I may have said on the page, the problem lies in peoples' misunderstanding of what Mysticism is. Mysticism is not the same thing as religion, although the two can overlap. Mysticism is much closer to Einstein's definition of 'Cosmic Religion'. It is beyond morality, hierarchies, Popes, Rabbis, Lamas etc, is non-dualistic and not about power structures. It is also, as you say, very invested in the exploration of Consciousness, specifically Consciousness of realms beyond the physical or three dimensional. So to draw parallels between Mysticism and QM is not to confirm the existence of the personal God of the Koran, the Bible or the Bagavad Gita but to reach out into the realms beyond these texts which are, nevertheless, hinted at in these texts. People are very afraid that if QM allows Mysticism legitimacy then it will allow all the fundamentalists back in and send us back to the Middle Ages. Everett, for instance, was very wary of telling Bohr his theory of Multiple Universes because he was afraid that 'it could be interpreted mystically in some quarters'. Ironically, Bohr dismissed Everett's ideas as ridiculous. Even more ironically, Everett was a committed atheist who nevertheless believed in Quantum Immortality! In this theory each individual Consciousness exists simultaneously in all the Multiple Universes, thus that Consciousness can never die, even if it does die in any number of the Mutiple Universes... A mind-blower!

In fact most of the Mystics of the Middle Ages whose insights parallel QM were denounced as heretics by the religious authorities. Mysticism was effectively a heresy at that time, which is why since the Middle Ages study of Western Mysticism has been so rare and suppressed. And yet Western Mysticism comes to the same conclusions as Eastern but uses different terms.

There is also the question being begged here: if the Mystics really WERE onto something, then how did they come to the conclusions that our modern Scientists are coming to without the benefit of advanced mathematics? It would mean that higher levels of Consciousness ARE available to us, which is exactly what the Mystics were interested in...

I have heard of Ken Wilber. I have a Kabbalistic Rabbi friend who is a great champion of his work. I will have a look. Thank you.

Something that is fascinating about QM is that, over a century after its foundational theories were coined by Einstein and the first generation of QMers, it has yet to change our paradigm on a mass level. Newtonian/Descartian Physics didn't take long to change Western Consciousness. Indeed, it could be argued that their scientific vision influenced everything in the West from politics to economics and medicine. So far, QM hasn't shifted anything. This is largely, of course, because it is felt a) we can't sense any of it and b) it doesn't effect us on a macrocosmic level. But we don't know that either of these things are true. What we don't know is HOW it effects us on a macrocosmic level - yet. But it is gradually changing various perceptions. If we could let go of the Newtonian Mind Set for a moment we could radically rethink all our systems on this planet from how we provide power for ourselves to how we interact with the natural world. We don't have to float around in parallel universes, but we could discover a more holistic, reciprocal way of interacting with each other.

So far only the New Agers have leapt on QM but their Mysticism is Mysticism-lite too. Fuzzy Science and Fuzzy Spirituality are two sides of the same coin. What would be useful, it seems to me, would be to invest some energy into exploring Consciousness more. In the past, only select people (Mystics) had the ability to enhance their Consciousness in a way which took us 'beyond' the physical into other Realities. If we invested in developing our Consciousness more in that way we could uncover interesting things. Its interesting - imagine a population with a 'Mystical Sense' rather than a minority? It would be very interesting! Lol! ThePeg (talk) 00:48, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why am I leaving Wikipedia?

Blainster, take a good look at my user page. I believe it documents that fact that I have been a long time contributor of good articles related to my many years of engineering experience.

So why have I decided to leave Wikipedia? Because I have grown weary of the revisions made by unexperienced people who think they know a subject when they really don't know it. I am also weary of people who make revisions because they "know better than anyone else". In particular, the actions of one young postgrad student who calls himself Headbomb with whom it is impossible to reason because of his firm belief that he is infallible ... and that he and only he "knows better than anyone else". His attitude has finally been the last straw in making my decision to leave Wikipedia. I am simply tired of trying to reason with the likes of Headbomb.

Goodbye to all the friends I did make here in the past two and a half years or so. mbeychok (talk) 16:32, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blues at WP:FAR

You are one of the leading editors of Blue, which has been listed at WP:FAR. Please follow the discussiona at Wikipedia:Featured article review/Blues and consider helping out.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 05:18, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Compact Cassette

I have nominated Compact Cassette for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. --Step hen 05:21, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Origen Church Father?

Its not as definitive as the other person thinks, see my addition to the discussion on Origen--76.31.242.174 (talk) 08:21, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A study on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies

Hi. I would like to ask whether you would agree to participate in a short survey on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies in articles pertaining to global warming and climate change (survey described here). If interested, please get in touch via my talkpage or email me Encyclopaedia21 (talk) 16:19, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oskar Heil transistor patent

I reverted back to the starting point with the correct quote. It might be a good idea to change it to mention the filing date differently, but don't change the quote if you try again at that. Dicklyon (talk) 01:50, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ENIAC

Blainster - I see you moved my recent addition to the UNIAC article from the lead paragraph to the programming section. After I composed this addition I debated where to put it in the article. I finally decided it was important enough to be in the lead. What I was attempting to say was that Los Alamos usurped the BRL's role as the user of the computer. This has nothing to do with programming. GroveGuy (talk) 22:28, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the edits to the article on transpersonal psychology

Thank you to the edits which you quickly made to the article on transpersonal psychology. Although I am sympathetic to Transpersonal Psychology myself (I teach it as part of my job, and have published articles/ presented conference papers on the topic), I did see the earlier version was rather clearly a violation of NPOV. Worse, it was inaccurate - to call transpersonal psychology "the positive psychology par excellence" would ignore how a definition of transpersonal psychology by Walsh and Vaughan (1993) aimed to be a comprehensive definition, looking at transpersonal psychology dealing with the negative as well as the positive side of life (that comment, by the way, was also ignoring differences between humanistic psychology and transpersonal psychology). So thank you for keeping an eye on what are clearly POV edits. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 20:24, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Carl Gustav Jung

There is a very good article page on Carl Gustav Jung and a sister page Answer to Job, if this is of your interests?

MacOfJesus (talk) 13:54, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

userpage

Thanks. You can contribute to my user pages if you want. — goethean ॐ 03:26, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Blainster! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 2 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Peter Mauzey - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:23, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Peter Mauzey

The article Peter Mauzey has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Seems to be a fairly minor contributor the the development of the cited synthesizer. All standard searches fail to find any bt passing mentions in connection with other people. Fails WP:PROF, WP:BIO and WP:N (WP:MUSIC not being relevent) since no RSs to find

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jubilee♫clipman 01:33, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SR-52

A tag has been placed on SR-52, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page, or a redirect loop.

If you can fix this redirect to point to an existing Wikipedia page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you also fix the redirect. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. - Camyoung54 talk 15:43, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

M'saken

added links pointing to Armenian, Syrian Christians and Georgia

Space architecture

added a link pointing to Ted Hall

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zeitgeist, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Henry Goddard and Nicholas Carr. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PC reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:55, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Golden Goose Award, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dog fish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Blainster. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Blainster. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mercury-vapor lamp, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages DOE and HID (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Blainster. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited George de Hevesy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Bury (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No article for English chemist Charles Bury.--Blainster (talk) 03:29, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vontae Davis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sean Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Blainster. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited RSA (cryptosystem), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Factoring (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:39, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SLS launch cost

@Blainster: Hi, I would like to solicit your input on a debate around the launch cost of the SLS rocket.

Jadebenn made an edit here : https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Space_Launch_System&diff=929316586&oldid=929241314

And since no one challenged his edit at the time he now considers it a consensus and refuses to revert back to old (and most importantely real) figures.

He refuses to debate my argument therefore I solicit your input into this.

Thanks - Moamem (talk) 04:56, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

David Ray Griffin

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:David Ray Griffin § Description and interests. Thank you. Roy McCoy (talk) 01:16, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Otter Creek (Vermont), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Middlebury and Brandon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Short descriptions

Just a friendly heads up that you may want to review WP:SDFORMAT and WP:SDNONE. Short descriptions should be 40 characters or less in most cases, and they are mainly used to differentiate an article title from other similar article titles. Occasionally, short descriptions aren't needed when the article title is self-explanatory (like suspended roller coaster). In those cases simply use {{Short description|none}}. Hope that helps! --GoneIn60 (talk) 17:17, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up; Blainster (talk) 22:03, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Railroad consist

G'day Blainster, It was good to see your addition to the Rolling stock article. I'm just contacting you to ask whether you think "sometimes" could be deleted. I live in Australia, and know that term is well embedded, and 4 decades of reading Trains magazine makes me confident it's the standard term in the U.S. So I'd like to suggest a modification:

In North America, Australia and other countries, the term consist (/ˈkɒnsɪst/ KON-sist) is used to refer to the rolling stock in a train.

You'll see I've made a couple of other tweaks. I'll leave it to you to decide which, if any, are desirable. Best wishes, Simon. – SCHolar44 (talk) 00:37, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited WKSC-FM, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WWBZ.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Manual of style discretionary sanctions

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the English Wikipedia Manual of Style and article titles policy. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:39, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ted Hughes

Hi, I gave my reasons for reverting your edits in the edit summary. There are a good deal of details and important nuance that you cut out. Those points were not written randomly, but carefully considered and taken from various Hughes biographes. Hughes changed his degree subject, then held very many jobs in his youth and they informed his experience and writing. He considered himself to be a working class Yorkshire man, so it's important to flag this in his context. Plath had won many awards before she met Hughes. I appreciate the urge for concision, but please don't knock out elements that show time progression or important context, small things thought they may seem. Anna (talk) 19:39, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Anna Roy Thanks for your detailed response. I will go ahead and put back the changes not pertaining to your objection. Blainster (talk) 20:36, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

N-dashes for dates, please

The MOS requires n-dashes between dates of birth and death, not hyphens. -- Ssilvers (talk) 16:11, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ssilvers Thank you. (but puzzled, because it's pretty hard to tell the difference.) I will have to use Wiki markup, then, because it's not on my keyboard. Blainster (talk) 16:17, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I don't know anything about bots. You can just copy and paste this in: –

-- Ssilvers (talk) 17:43, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ssilvers Much appreciated. Blainster (talk) 17:50, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wrexie Leonard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mercury.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 28

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Barbara Laage

added a link pointing to Hollywood

Nell Blaine

added a link pointing to Bluet

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Townes Van Zandt

I learned today from a Boulder Colorado High School classmate of Townes Van Zandt that he wrote the lyrics for Pancho and Lefty at The Sink Bar in Boulder Colorado sitting on top a table in one of the backrooms. Soon thereafter Townes fell off a wall with a back and head injury and he forgot where the song came from. The lyric writer was Larry Nelson BHS class of 1962. KSMOR (talk) 00:40, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@KSMOR Your use of "he" in your first sentence leaves it ambiguous which person wrote the lyrics, so it's a good thing you clarified it in the last sentence. Thanks for the info, but unless it is published, we can't put it in Wikipedia. Didn't your friend talk to Van Zandt after his fall to remind him who wrote the lyrics? Blainster (talk) 14:37, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Prince edits

We can't say he was one of the greatest musicians as fact. We have to frame it as a claim, per WP:PEACOCK, which I linked in my first reversal of your edit. I explained the rest of the reversal in my second edit. Please use the talk page going forward to discuss any unresolved concerns with my reversal, this content dispute, etc. per WP:3RR and WP:BRD. 𝒮𝒾𝓇 𝒯𝑒𝒻𝓁𝑜𝓃 (talk | contribs) 17:25, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sally Foster Otis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harrison Gray Otis.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Current

I appreciate your attempt to make articles more durable by adjusting references to time. I just wanted to point out that this one was not particularly successful. In context here, in use and in current use have the same meaning. Same with current and latest. I generally revert changes that are not clear improvements to avoid wasting time quibbling over several good solutions. ~Kvng (talk) 15:41, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Psyche (spacecraft)

Nice edit at Psyche (spacecraft). Totally non-glamorous, utterly routine, but really good. Springnuts (talk) 12:45, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to The Big Bang Theory have been removed because you cited the information you added to IMDb. As discussed at WP:RS/IMDb, IMDb is considered a questionable source, and generally should not be used as a sole reference. You are welcome to re-add the information using a different reliable source, or with an additional source confirming the information from IMDb. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 20:29, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

While I agree with the substance of this edit (which was added in this edit while I was taking an extended break from Wikipedia), please don't call good-faith additions "trite". It also might raise suspicions of being related to another editor who did the same thing. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 17:34, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Culture series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Circa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chicago and North Western Transportation Company, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rock Springs.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Christopher Williams (singer)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Christopher Williams (singer), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:29, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop now

Please stop removing "now" indiscriminately. The policy only says "words to watch", not "words to remove everywhere, not caring whether the replacement makes sense". Per MOS:VAMOS "now in Foo museum" is the correct phrase to use, avoiding nonsense like "The Mona Lisa is currently in the Louvre Museum", or works of art "residing" being "held" and so on. . Johnbod (talk) 12:16, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Johnbod

Thanks for your suggestions, pointing out that part of the MOS, and your civility. My removal of those adjectives is general, but not indiscriminate. They generally do not belong in an encyclopedia, as opposed to, for example, a newspaper. However, considering that the art articles are more carefully supervised, I will try to follow VAMOS. Your examples on "currently" and "residing" are clear, but can you tell me why being "held" is poor form? That seems fairly common to me. Blainster (talk) 15:35, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it may be rather a personal view, but typically archives and maybe libraries have "holdings" while

galleries and museums have "collections". You will very rarely find the best RS saying a painting is "held" (& if you do, it will probably be in a recent junior American academic context). VAMOS tries to avoid needless prolixity & Latinate formality, when "now in" does the job perfectly well. Johnbod (talk) 17:25, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Johnbod Thanks, that helps. Blainster (talk) 18:32, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COP16

Hello, can you check the wording of the article 2024 United Nations Biodiversity Conference there are spelling mistakes --57ntaledane90 (talk) 12:53, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@57ntaledane90 It looks OK to me. 1) The spelling of "Türkiye" in the quote appears to be the spelling of Turkey in their native language. 2) I added a word ("of") that had been left out at the start of the quote, to form a complete sentence. 3) Also, there are two references in the article that are in Spanish language. These should be changed to English language alternatives. I don't speak Spanish so I can't help with that. Blainster (talk) 20:46, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join New pages patrol

Hello Blainster!

The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Xylem Inc., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Springfield, NJ.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]